翻訳と辞書 |
Jablonski by Pahls v. United States : ウィキペディア英語版 | Jablonski by Pahls v. United States Jablonski by Pahls v. United States, 712 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1983) is a landmark case in which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a mental health professional's duty to predict dangerousness includes consulting a patient's prior records, and that their duty to protect includes the involuntary commitment of a dangerous individual; simply warning the foreseeable victim is insufficient. ==Facts== Mr. Jablonski was dating Ms. Kimball but had threatened to kill her and her mother (Ms. Pahls). After one incident that culminated in a threat towards her mother, she took him to the Loma Linda VA Hospital, where the doctor conducted a risk assessment, but did not consult his prior records; which documented a history of violent behavior. Based on this incomplete data, he determined erroneously that Jablonski was not a danger to himself or others and released him. He warned Ms. Kimball to leave Jablonski but did not warn her of his potential for violence. When Mr. Jablonski was discharged from the hospital, he killed Ms. Kimball.〔 〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jablonski by Pahls v. United States」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|